![]() The paper counters another way of reading Heidegger’s writings on art and technology which argues for a leap out of technology into poetic dwelling with nature, arguing that this neo-Romantic view overlooks crucial aspects of Heidegger’s concept of Gelassenheit: the non-willing “letting be” that enables humans to be with the things of nature in their otherwise possibilities – other than as ordered by technological enframing. Art keeps open the possibility that human being might be otherwise than as the being destined for technological enframing. In its singularly resistive stance within technology, art partakes in the “other beginning,” or the turning of technology out of itself and towards the event of Being. Heidegger’s writings on art and technology indicate a way of thinking with technology otherwise, in the openness of the event of Being (Ereignis). Nature philosophy is a thinking with nature “otherwise” in open possibility. ![]() ![]() This paper undertakes a reading of Heidegger’s later writing in terms of nature philosophy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |